Bench testing of a drilling shock absorber with a multistart screw unit during hard-rock drilling with a PDC bit

Authors

  • A. S. Velychkovych Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska St., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019
  • S. M. Landar National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic” 24, Av. Vitaliia Hrytsaienka, Poltava, 36011, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9868-2026-1(45)-100-114

Keywords:

bench testing, drilling shock absorber, screw unit, PDC bit, Belleville springs, rate of penetration

Abstract

During deep drilling of hard and interbedded rocks, the drill string operates as a long, elastically deformable system that is sensitive to changes in drilling operating parameters and bit–bottomhole contact conditions. A dangerous manifestation of the unstable dynamics of such a system is intermittent bit rotation, known as stick-slip, which is accompanied by peak torsional loads and the risk of PDC bit damage. This paper presents a laboratory prototype structurally similar to a downhole shock absorber for longitudinal-torsional vibrations of a drill string. The main units of the prototype are a multistart non-self-locking screw pair and a pack of Belleville springs. Through their interaction, an increase in torque is converted into axial displacement of the output shaft, followed by additional compression of the elastic element. The aim of the study was to perform bench testing of the shock absorber prototype during hard-rock drilling with a PDC bit and to evaluate its effect on the rate of penetration compared with a rigid load-transmission scheme. The tests were carried out on a 2A554 radial drilling machine using a 92 mm PDC bit and granite specimens. Two configurations were compared: rigid connection of the bit to the spindle and installation of the shock absorber between the spindle and the bit. For each operating mode, the time required to drill a 10 mm control interval was recorded, and the rate of penetration was calculated. Before drilling, static calibration of the screw and elastic units was performed. It was established that the absorber axial displacement range of 10–15 mm recorded on the test bench corresponded to a torque of 170–225 N·m and a compression force of 1253–1773 N. The use of the shock absorber increased the rate of penetration in the tested operating modes. The relative increase was 22.3–34.6%, while the integral increase based on the total drilling time was approximately 25.3%; a more pronounced effect was observed under more intensive drilling modes. The obtained results confirm the operability of the shock absorber prototype and justify the transition toward the development of an experimental downhole shock absorber for field testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mantegazini D. Z., Nascimento A., Dornelas V. F., Mathias M. H. Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of the Rate of Penetration and Mechanical Specific Energy: A Case Study Applied to a Carbonate Hard Rock Reservoir Based on a Drill Rate Test Using Play-Back Methodology. Applied Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14, no. 6. P. 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062234

2. Song J., Liu S., He Y., Jiang S., Zhou S., Zhu H. The state-of-the-art review on the drill pipe vibration. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 2024. Vol. 243. P. 213337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213337

3. Zhang H., Tian K., Detournay E. A high-fidelity model for nonlinear self-excited oscillations in rotary drilling systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2024. Vol. 573. P. 118193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.118193

4. Richard T., Germay C., Detournay E. A simplified model to explore the root cause of stick-slip vibrations in drilling systems with drag bits. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2007. Vol. 305, no. 3. P. 432–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.04.015

5. Leine R. I., van Campen D. H., Keultjes W. J. G. Stick-slip Whirl Interaction in Drillstring Dynamics. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2002. Vol. 124, no. 2. P. 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1452745

6. Jansen J. D., van den Steen L. Active damping of self-excited torsional vibrations in oil well drillstrings. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1995. Vol. 179, no. 4. P. 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0042

7. Tang L., Guo B., Zhu X., Shi C., Zhou Y. Stick–slip vibrations in oil well drillstring: A review. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 2020. Vol. 39, no. 4. P. 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348419853658

8. Landar S., Velychkovych A., Ropyak L., Andrusyak A. A Method for Applying the Use of a Smart 4 Controller for the Assessment of Drill String Bottom-Part Vibrations and Shock Loads. Vibration. 2024. Vol. 7, no. 3. P. 802–828. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration7030043

9. Landar S., Velychkovych A., Vytvytskyi V., Ropyak L. Threshold vibration metrics of drilling tools as indicators of bit wear and rate of penetration decline: Field trials and data interpretation. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2025. Vol. 19, no. 4. P. 147–157. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining19.04.147

10. Srivastava S., Sharma A., Teodoriu C. Optimizing sampling frequency of surface and downhole measurements for efficient stick-slip vibration detection. Petroleum. 2024. Vol. 10, no. 1. P. 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2023.02.004

11. Watson W., Witt-Doerring Y., Sugiura J., Pastusek P., Daechsel D., Vallet L., Amish M., Oluyemi G. IADC Code Upgrade: Interpretation of Surface and Downhole Data to Support Drilling Forensics. SPE Journal. 2023. Vol. 28, no. 6. P. 2693–2712. https://doi.org/10.2118/210243-PA

12. Brett J. F., Warren T. M., Behr S. M. Bit Whirl: A New Theory of PDC Bit Failure. SPE Drilling Engineering. 1990. Vol. 5, no. 04. P. 275–281. https://doi.org/10.2118/19571-PA

13. Fear M. J., Abbassian F., Parfitt S. H. L., McClean A. The Destruction of PDC Bits by Severe Slip-Stick Vibration. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–6 March 1997. Paper SPE-37639-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37639-MS

14. Huang Z., Xie D., Xie B., Zhang W., Zhang F., He L. Investigation of PDC bit failure base on stick-slip vibration analysis of drilling string system plus drill bit. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2018. Vol. 417. P. 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.11.053

15. Abbas R. K. A review on the wear of oil drill bits: conventional and the state of the art approaches for wear reduction and quantification. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2018. Vol. 90. P. 554–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.026

16. Kanyanta V., Dormer A., Murphy N., Ivankovic A. Impact fatigue fracture of polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters and the effect of microstructure. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 2014. Vol. 46. P. 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.06.003

17. Rahmani R., Pastusek P., Yun G., Roberts T. Investigation of PDC Cutter Structural Integrity in Hard Rocks. SPE Drilling & Completion. 2021. Vol. 36, no. 01. P. 11–28. https://doi.org/10.2118/199598-PA

18. Selnes K. S., Clemmensen C., Reimers N. Drilling Difficult Formations Efficiently With the Use of an Antistall Tool. SPE Drilling & Completion. 2009. Vol. 24, no. 04. P. 531–536. https://doi.org/10.2118/111874-PA

19. Nessjøen P. J., Kyllingstad A., D’Ambrosio P., Fonseca I. S., Garcia A., Levy B. Field Experience With an Active Stick-Slip Prevention System. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1–3 March 2011. Paper SPE-139956-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/139956-MS

20. Vromen T., Detournay E., Nijmeijer H., van de Wouw N. Dynamics of Drilling Systems With an Antistall Tool: Effect on Rate of Penetration and Mechanical Specific Energy. SPE Journal. 2019. Vol. 24, no. 05. P. 1982–1996. https://doi.org/10.2118/194487-PA

21. Sharma A., Abid K., Srivastava S., Baena Velasquez A. F., Teodoriu C. A review of torsional vibration mitigation techniques using active control and machine learning strategies. Petroleum. 2024. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2023.09.007

22. Velychkovych A., Mykhailiuk V., Andrusyak A. Evaluation of the Adaptive Behavior of a Shell-Type Elastic Element of a Drilling Shock Absorber with Increasing External Load Amplitude. Vibration. 2025. Vol. 8, no. 4. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration8040060

23. Dutkiewicz M., Velychkovych A., Shatskyi I., Shopa V. Efficient Model of the Interaction of Elastomeric Filler with an Open Shell and a Chrome-Plated Shaft in a Dry Friction Damper. Materials. 2022. Vol. 15, no. 13. P. 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134671

24. Aribowo A. G., Aarsnes U. J. F., Chen K., Detournay E., van de Wouw N. Analysis of a downhole passive regulator in drilling: A distributed parameter modeling approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2025. Vol. 618, Part B. P. 119300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119300

25. Moisyshyn V. M., Slabyi O. O. Creation of the Vibroprotective Device for Adjustment of Dynamics of a Column of Steel Drill Pipes and a Bit. Metallofizika i Noveishie Tekhnologii. 2018. Vol. 40, no. 4. P. 541–550. https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.40.04.0541

26. Moisyshyn V. М., Vekeryk, V. I. Analysis of shock absorbers structures of longitudinal torsional vibrations of the drilling columns. Precarpathian Bulletin of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Number, 2024. Vol. 19, no. 73. P. 140–154. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7399-2024-19(73)-140-154

27. Srivastava S., Teodoriu C. An extensive review of laboratory scaled experimental setups for studying drill string vibrations and the way forward. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019. Vol. 182. P. 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106272

28. Velychkovych A., Bedzir O., Shopa V. Laboratory experimental study of contact interaction between cut shells and resilient bodies. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2021. Vol. 9. P. 425–438. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2021.5.003

29. Barnett L., Al Dushaishi M. F., Khan M. F. M. H. Experimental investigation of drillstring torsional vibration effect on rate of penetration with PDC bits in hard rock. Geothermics. 2022. Vol. 103. P. 102410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102410

30. Zhang J., Cui M., Wang Q., Ren H., Ji G., Shao F., Zhuo L., Li H., Yu J. Experimental study on rock drilling vibration of PDC bit in interbedded formations. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 2025. Vol. 244. P. 213452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213452

31. Moisyshyn V. M., Lyskanych M. V., Zhovniruk R. A., Majkovych Ye. P. Analysis of stand research results of axial dynamic force in drilling by three roller cone bit. Precarpathian Bulletin of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Number. 2019. Vol. 1, no. 53. P. 81–93. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7399-2019-1(53)-81-93

32. Landar S., Velychkovych A., Mykhailiuk V. Numerical and analytical models of the mechanism of torque and axial load transmission in a shock absorber for drilling oil, gas and geothermal wells. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2024. Vol. 12, no. 3. P. 207–220. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2024.3.002

Published

28.05.2026

How to Cite

Velychkovych, A. S., & Landar, S. M. (2026). Bench testing of a drilling shock absorber with a multistart screw unit during hard-rock drilling with a PDC bit. Oil and Gas Power Engineering, (1(45), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9868-2026-1(45)-100-114

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING

Similar Articles

<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.